Gramophone Online ( http://www.gramophone.co.uk/ ) lists the following EMI
Celibidache recordings to be released in the UK on May 4, 1999
Beethoven Sym No 3. Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDC5 56839-2
Beethoven Sym No 6. Leonore Ov No 3. Munich PO / Celibidache. (F)
CDC5 56840-2
Beethoven Sym No 9. Donath / Soffel / Jerusalem / Lika / Ch / Munich
PO / Celibidache. (F) CDC5 56842-2
Beethoven Syms Nos 1-9. Brahms Syms Nos 1-4. Deutsches Requiem
(pp1990s: 10 CDs). Sols / Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDS5 56837-2
Beethoven Syms Nos 2 & 5. Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDC5
56838-2
Beethoven Syms Nos 7 & 8. Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDC5
56841-2
Brahms Sym No 1. Deutsches Requiem (2 CDs). Auger / Van Dam / Ch /
Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDS5 56843-2
Brahms Syms Nos 2-4 (2 CDs). Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDS5
56846-2
For those unfamiliar with Gramophone listings, (F) indicates full price.
I would have preferred to see a completion of the Schumann cycle begun in VOL 1
instead of repeats of Beethoven 4 and 5, even if they are different
performances.
Regarding the change in labels, this is purely speculation, but it is possible
that EMI wasn't interested in extending their contract. Or, perhaps the family
became aware of EMI's penchant for discontinuing releases prematurely. Maybe DG
made a better offer.
That's all I know
Dan Dickstein
L EW wrote:
> Why has Celibidache's son allied with Deutsche Gramaphon rather than EMI
> for future releases, even with the Munich Philharmonic? He wrote so
> glowingly about his relationship with EMI in the booklets that accompany
> the CD's. Are you aware if a problem developed between the family and
> EMI? Are there going to be any further EMI releases by Celibidache?
>
> Regards,
>
> Lew Epstein
--------------5728C60893C5E6D04634B172
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Gramophone Online ( http://www.gramophone.co.uk/
) lists the following EMI Celibidache recordings to be released in the
UK on May 4, 1999
Beethoven Sym No 3. Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDC5 56839-2
Beethoven Sym No 6. Leonore Ov No 3. Munich
PO / Celibidache. (F)
CDC5 56840-2
Beethoven Sym No 9. Donath / Soffel / Jerusalem
/ Lika / Ch / Munich
PO / Celibidache. (F) CDC5 56842-2
Beethoven Syms Nos 1-9. Brahms Syms Nos 1-4.
Deutsches Requiem
(pp1990s: 10 CDs). Sols / Munich PO / Celibidache.
(F) CDS5 56837-2
Beethoven Syms Nos 2 & 5. Munich PO / Celibidache.
(F) CDC5
56838-2
Beethoven Syms Nos 7 & 8. Munich PO / Celibidache.
(F) CDC5
56841-2
Brahms Sym No 1. Deutsches Requiem (2 CDs).
Auger / Van Dam / Ch /
Munich PO / Celibidache. (F) CDS5 56843-2
Brahms Syms Nos 2-4 (2 CDs). Munich PO / Celibidache.
(F) CDS5
56846-2
For those unfamiliar with Gramophone listings, (F) indicates full price.
I would have preferred to see a completion of the Schumann cycle begun in VOL 1 instead of repeats of Beethoven 4 and 5, even if they are different performances.
Regarding the change in labels, this is purely speculation, but it is possible that EMI wasn't interested in extending their contract. Or, perhaps the family became aware of EMI's penchant for discontinuing releases prematurely. Maybe DG made a better offer.
That's all I know
Dan Dickstein
L EW wrote:
Why has Celibidache's son allied with Deutsche Gramaphon rather than EMI
for future releases, even with the Munich Philharmonic? He wrote so
glowingly about his relationship with EMI in the booklets that accompany
the CD's. Are you aware if a problem developed between the family and
EMI? Are there going to be any further EMI releases by Celibidache?Regards,
Lew Epstein
--------------5728C60893C5E6D04634B172--